Cit:Price:2007: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
(Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „{{Literatur |Autor=Price, C |Jahr =2007 |Titel= Predicting environmental conditions to minimise salt damage at the Tower of London: a comparison of two approac…“) |
Keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung |
||
(Eine dazwischenliegende Version desselben Benutzers wird nicht angezeigt) | |||
Zeile 22: | Zeile 22: | ||
'''Eintrag in der Bibliographie''' | '''Eintrag in der Bibliographie''' | ||
<bibprint citation="Price:2007"/> | |||
==Abstract== | |||
The paper compares the results of two studies of salt damage at the Wakefield Tower, Tower of London. The first, in 1993, was based on semi-quantitative salt analysis and hygroscopicity measurements. The second was based on quantitative analysis and a thermodynamic model, ECOS. Both studies aimed to predict environmental conditions that would minimise salt damage to the interior stonework. Their predictions are markedly different, and this paper examines the reasons for the differences. It is shown that hygroscopicity alone is not a reliable indicator of crystallisation from mixed salt solutions. | |||
[[Category:Literatur]] |
Aktuelle Version vom 15. Dezember 2022, 14:57 Uhr
Autor | Price, C |
Jahr | 2007 |
Titel | Predicting environmental conditions to minimise salt damage at the Tower of London: a comparison of two approaches |
Bibtex | @article { Price:2007,
title = {Predicting environmental conditions to minimise salt damage at the Tower of London: a comparison of two approaches}, journal = {Environmental Geology}, year = {2007}, volume = {52}, number = {2}, pages = {369-374}, note = {The paper compares the results of two studies of salt damage at the Wakefield Tower, Tower of London. The first, in 1993, was based on semi-quantitative salt analysis and hygroscopicity measurements. The second was based on quantitative analysis and a thermodynamic model, ECOS. Both studies aimed to predict environmental conditions that would minimise salt damage to the interior stonework. Their predictions are markedly different, and this paper examines the reasons for the differences. It is shown that hygroscopicity alone is not a reliable indicator of crystallisation from mixed salt solutions.}, key = {ECOS}, url = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00254-006-0477-9}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-006-0477-9}, author = {Price, C.} } |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-006-0477-9 |
Link | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00254-006-0477-9 |
Bemerkungen | in: Environmental Geology, 52 (2), S. 369-374 |
Eintrag in der Bibliographie
[Price:2007] | Price, C. (2007): Predicting environmental conditions to minimise salt damage at the Tower of London: a comparison of two approaches. In: Environmental Geology, 52 (2), 369-374, Webadresse, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-006-0477-9 |
Abstract[Bearbeiten]
The paper compares the results of two studies of salt damage at the Wakefield Tower, Tower of London. The first, in 1993, was based on semi-quantitative salt analysis and hygroscopicity measurements. The second was based on quantitative analysis and a thermodynamic model, ECOS. Both studies aimed to predict environmental conditions that would minimise salt damage to the interior stonework. Their predictions are markedly different, and this paper examines the reasons for the differences. It is shown that hygroscopicity alone is not a reliable indicator of crystallisation from mixed salt solutions.