Cit:Price:2007: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus Salzwiki
Zur Navigation springen Zur Suche springen
(Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „{{Literatur |Autor=Price, C |Jahr =2007 |Titel= Predicting environmental conditions to minimise salt damage at the Tower of London: a comparison of two approac…“)
 
Keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung
 
(Eine dazwischenliegende Version desselben Benutzers wird nicht angezeigt)
Zeile 22: Zeile 22:


'''Eintrag in der Bibliographie'''
'''Eintrag in der Bibliographie'''
<bibprint citation="Price:2007"/>


<bibprint citation="Price:2007"/>
==Abstract==
The paper compares the results of two studies of salt damage at the Wakefield Tower, Tower of London. The first, in 1993, was based on semi-quantitative salt analysis and hygroscopicity measurements. The second was based on quantitative analysis and a thermodynamic model, ECOS. Both studies aimed to predict environmental conditions that would minimise salt damage to the interior stonework. Their predictions are markedly different, and this paper examines the reasons for the differences. It is shown that hygroscopicity alone is not a reliable indicator of crystallisation from mixed salt solutions.
 
[[Category:Literatur]]

Aktuelle Version vom 15. Dezember 2022, 14:57 Uhr

Autor Price, C
Jahr 2007
Titel Predicting environmental conditions to minimise salt damage at the Tower of London: a comparison of two approaches
Bibtex @article { Price:2007,

title = {Predicting environmental conditions to minimise salt damage at the Tower of London: a comparison of two approaches}, journal = {Environmental Geology}, year = {2007}, volume = {52}, number = {2}, pages = {369-374}, note = {The paper compares the results of two studies of salt damage at the Wakefield Tower, Tower of London. The first, in 1993, was based on semi-quantitative salt analysis and hygroscopicity measurements. The second was based on quantitative analysis and a thermodynamic model, ECOS. Both studies aimed to predict environmental conditions that would minimise salt damage to the interior stonework. Their predictions are markedly different, and this paper examines the reasons for the differences. It is shown that hygroscopicity alone is not a reliable indicator of crystallisation from mixed salt solutions.}, key = {ECOS}, url = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00254-006-0477-9}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-006-0477-9}, author = {Price, C.} }

DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-006-0477-9
Link https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00254-006-0477-9
Bemerkungen in: Environmental Geology, 52 (2), S. 369-374


Eintrag in der Bibliographie

[Price:2007]Price, C. (2007): Predicting environmental conditions to minimise salt damage at the Tower of London: a comparison of two approaches. In: Environmental Geology, 52 (2), 369-374, Webadresse, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-006-0477-9Link zu Google Scholar

Abstract[Bearbeiten]

The paper compares the results of two studies of salt damage at the Wakefield Tower, Tower of London. The first, in 1993, was based on semi-quantitative salt analysis and hygroscopicity measurements. The second was based on quantitative analysis and a thermodynamic model, ECOS. Both studies aimed to predict environmental conditions that would minimise salt damage to the interior stonework. Their predictions are markedly different, and this paper examines the reasons for the differences. It is shown that hygroscopicity alone is not a reliable indicator of crystallisation from mixed salt solutions.