Bommel.etal 2004: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
K (hat „Bommel.etal:2004“ nach „Bommel.etal 2004“ verschoben) |
Keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung |
||
| Zeile 1: | Zeile 1: | ||
<bibimport /> | <bibimport /> | ||
{{Literatur | |||
|Autor=Maarten van Bommel<sup>1</sup>, Lorraine Gibson<sup>2</sup>, Simon Watts<sup>3</sup>, Velichka Kontozova<sup>4</sup>, Lieve Halsberghe<sup>5</sup> | |||
|Jahr =2004 | |||
|Titel=A comparison of diffusion tube determinations of formic and acetic acid concentrations in air | |||
|Bibtex=<bib id=Bommel.etal:2004/> | |||
|DOI= | |||
|Link=Volltext: [[Datei:Bommel et al-2004.pdf]] | |||
|Bemerkungen = | |||
}} | |||
1: Netherlands Institute for Cultural Heritage (ICN), PO Box 76709, 1070 KA Amsterdam, The Netherlands<br>2: University of Strathclyde, Department of Pure and Applied Science, 295 Cathedral Street, Glasgow G1 1XL, Scotland<br>3: School of Biological and Molecular Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Headington, Oxford OX3 0BP, United Kingdom<br>4: University of Antwerp, Department of Chemistry, Universiteitsplein 1, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium<br>5: Private ceramics conservator, Luxemburg | |||
'''Eintrag in der Bibliographie''' | |||
<bibprint/> | |||
== Keywords == | == Keywords == | ||
| Zeile 7: | Zeile 21: | ||
== Abstract == | == Abstract == | ||
After inconsistent results of air concentration measurements of volatile organic acids in display cases at the Museum of London (UK) and in the City Museum of Kortrijk (Belgium), a comparison of methods was carried out amongst the institutions most actively involved in these determinations. Each laboratory had its samplers exposed to known air concentrations of formic and acetic acid in the calibrated exposure chamber at ICN and in three display cases at the City Museum of Kortrijk. After exposure the tubes were all returned to their origin and analysed. Comparison of the results shows that each laboratory is rather consistent but between laboratories numbers can differ with a factor 2. | After inconsistent results of air concentration measurements of volatile organic acids in display cases at the Museum of London (UK) and in the City Museum of Kortrijk (Belgium), a comparison of methods was carried out amongst the institutions most actively involved in these determinations. Each laboratory had its samplers exposed to known air concentrations of formic and acetic acid in the calibrated exposure chamber at ICN and in three display cases at the City Museum of Kortrijk. After exposure the tubes were all returned to their origin and analysed. Comparison of the results shows that each laboratory is rather consistent but between laboratories numbers can differ with a factor 2. | ||
== Anlagen == | == Anlagen == | ||
Version vom 24. Mai 2011, 15:27 Uhr
<bibimport />
| Autor | Maarten van Bommel1, Lorraine Gibson2, Simon Watts3, Velichka Kontozova4, Lieve Halsberghe5 |
| Jahr | 2004 |
| Titel | A comparison of diffusion tube determinations of formic and acetic acid concentrations in air |
| Bibtex | [Bommel.etal:2004]Titel: A comparison of diffusion tube determinations of formic and acetic acid concentrations in air Autor / Verfasser: van Bommel, Maarten; Gibson, Lorraine; Watts, Simon; Kontozova, Velichka; Halsberghe, Lieve 
|
| DOI | |
| Link | Volltext: Datei:Bommel et al-2004.pdf |
| Bemerkungen |
1: Netherlands Institute for Cultural Heritage (ICN), PO Box 76709, 1070 KA Amsterdam, The Netherlands
2: University of Strathclyde, Department of Pure and Applied Science, 295 Cathedral Street, Glasgow G1 1XL, Scotland
3: School of Biological and Molecular Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Headington, Oxford OX3 0BP, United Kingdom
4: University of Antwerp, Department of Chemistry, Universiteitsplein 1, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium
5: Private ceramics conservator, Luxemburg
Eintrag in der Bibliographie
[Filter fehlt]
Keywords[Bearbeiten]
Abstract[Bearbeiten]
After inconsistent results of air concentration measurements of volatile organic acids in display cases at the Museum of London (UK) and in the City Museum of Kortrijk (Belgium), a comparison of methods was carried out amongst the institutions most actively involved in these determinations. Each laboratory had its samplers exposed to known air concentrations of formic and acetic acid in the calibrated exposure chamber at ICN and in three display cases at the City Museum of Kortrijk. After exposure the tubes were all returned to their origin and analysed. Comparison of the results shows that each laboratory is rather consistent but between laboratories numbers can differ with a factor 2.