Cit:Larsen:2021

Aus Salzwiki
Version vom 25. April 2023, 14:40 Uhr von LTemplin (Diskussion | Beiträge)
(Unterschied) ← Nächstältere Version | Aktuelle Version (Unterschied) | Nächstjüngere Version → (Unterschied)
Zur Navigation springen Zur Suche springen
Autor Larsen, P. K.
Jahr 2021
Titel Durabilitiy of traditional renders on a garden wall at Marienlyst Park, Elsinore
Bibtex @inproceedings { Larsen:2021,

title = {Durabilitiy of traditional renders on a garden wall at Marienlyst Park, Elsinore}, booktitle = {Proceedings of SWBSS 2021 – Fifth International Conference on Salt Weathering of Buildings and Stone Sculptures}, year = {2021}, editor = {Lubelli, B.; Kamat, A.A.; Quist, W.J.}, pages = {317-326}, publisher = {TU Delft Open}, note = {The wall surrounding Marienlyst Park has suffered decay for many decades. A test program was conducted over five years to find the most durable solution for its maintenance. The performance of six different renders was evaluated by moisture measurements over the cross section of the wall. Only traditional mortars with lime or hydraulic lime binders were tested. Restoration mortars containing Portland cement and additives were not included. The 15th century brick wall is approximately 3 m high and has a 1.5 m backfill of soil. The water content of the wall was monitored with a dielectric probe at three levels above the ground. The average moisture content changed during the test period in accordance with the rainfall. There was an increase in wet seasons and decrease in dry seasons. The drying rate was rapid and almost independent of the type of render. The main source of moisture was the soil at the back side rather than driving rain at the front side. The decay related mainly to the thickness and the composition of the plaster. Two or three layers of hydraulic lime mortars were the most resistant to weathering, whereas a single layer of lime mortar was the least durable. It is difficult to predict the lifetime of the renders based on the performance in the first five years. Even the best rendering will likely require regular maintenance due to the moisture migration from the soil.}, key = {SWBSS 2021}, url = {https://predict.kikirpa.be/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/SWBSS2021_Procedings.pdf }, author = {Larsen, P. K.} }

DOI
Link
Bemerkungen in: Lubelli, B.; Kamat, A.A.; Quist, W.J. (Hrsg.): Proceedings of SWBSS 2021 – Fifth International Conference on Salt Weathering of Buildings and Stone Sculptures,TU Delft Open 317-326


Eintrag in der Bibliographie

[Larsen:2021]Larsen, P. K. (2021): Durabilitiy of traditional renders on a garden wall at Marienlyst Park, Elsinore. In: Lubelli, B.; Kamat, A.A.; Quist, W.J. (Hrsg.): Proceedings of SWBSS 2021 – Fifth International Conference on Salt Weathering of Buildings and Stone Sculptures,TU Delft Open 317-326, Webadresse.Link zu Google Scholar

Keywords[Bearbeiten]

Durability, traditional render, moisture content, weathering, brick wall

Abstract[Bearbeiten]

The wall surrounding Marienlyst Park has suffered decay for many decades. A test program was conducted over five years to find the most durable solution for its maintenance. The performance of six different renders was evaluated by moisture measurements over the cross section of the wall. Only traditional mortars with lime or hydraulic lime binders were tested. Restoration mortars containing Portland cement and additives were not included. The 15th century brick wall is approximately 3 m high and has a 1.5 m backfill of soil. The water content of the wall was monitored with a dielectric probe at three levels above the ground. The average moisture content changed during the test period in accordance with the rainfall. There was an increase in wet seasons and decrease in dry seasons. The drying rate was rapid and almost independent of the type of render. The main source of moisture was the soil at the back side rather than driving rain at the front side. The decay related mainly to the thickness and the composition of the plaster. Two or three layers of hydraulic lime mortars were the most resistant to weathering, whereas a single layer of lime mortar was the least durable. It is difficult to predict the lifetime of the renders based on the performance in the first five years. Even the best rendering will likely require regular maintenance due to the moisture migration from the soil.